Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Emily Church Reflects on Part 3 of The Hole in Our Gospel

Emily Church is the team leader of Health Connection, a ministry of New City Fellowship and Restore St. Louis focused on connecting poor residents in St. Louis with health care.


President Carter identified a hole in our society, defined by poverty, human suffering, and inequality. He sees a world unraveling at an alarming rate as the rick get richer and the poor get poorer, creating greater and greater social and international disparity and isolation. Bono sees a hole too—in our morality. He sees the world’s poor, beaten and bloody, lying at the wayside, while the majority of us pass by without stopping. Either way you look at it, there is a hole that needs to be repaired—and it’s getting deeper (pg 105).

As you get into this section of the book, are you starting to wonder how the world could be so messed up, so broken and consequently devastating the most vulnerable (i.e. 26,500 children dying a day of preventable diseases, pg 107)?

Have you ever wondered why the rich get richer and the poor get poorer? How would you answer this question and how does it relate to you personally?

Stearns claims that, …it is easier for us to ignore the world’s poorest because they are “over there” (pg 99). At this point I thought, “What about the poor in our midst?” Is there a relationship between the way we address local poverty and our initiative toward global poverty? How does involvement in issues of social justice and caring for the poor affect our global perspective?

The love of Jesus Christ was so profound because he…”Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.” Philippians 2:5-7

Stearn explains that, we have the awareness, access and ability to reach out to our most desperate neighbors around the world…This is truly good news—or is it” Stearn is getting to a good point here…our tools and skills are only as useful as the heart of the people willing to employ them. Sometimes I feel like we’re missing it. All through graduate school (I studied public health with a concentration in international health) I wrestled with the nagging suspicion that all the science and best programming in the world is not going to solve the brokenness.

I am refreshed by the way Lewis Smedes emphasizes the healing power in us through the gift of Christ on the cross. Because we have access to the power of true love we are moved in kindness toward people in need…”The pity that wells up in us after watching a television documentary on starving children is not kindness. Kindness is the strength to take the starving child in your arms and feed it at your own breast. Kindness is the power to heal a leper by washing his wounds.” He goes on to say, “If we leave the work of kindness to professionals, kindness will be replaced by efficiency. Love will be lost and welfare will take its place.”

Stearn moves on to consider how we as wealthy Americans perceive the poor and makes an important point that…Perhaps the greatest mistake commonly made by those who strive to help the poor is the failure to see the assets and strengths that are always present in people and communities no matter how poor they are. (pg 128)

In the book When Helping Hurts, Steve Corbett and Brian Fikkert unpack the deeper dimensions of our concept of poverty and it’s implications in how we work for poverty alleviation. They address the difficult truth that the “economically rich often have “god-complexes,” a subtle and unconscious sense of superiority in which they believe that they have achieved their wealth through their own efforts and that they have been anointed to decide what is best for low-income people, whom they view as inferior to themselves…The way that we act toward the economically poor often communicates—albeit unintentionally—that we are superior and they are inferior. In the process, we hurt the poor and ourselves.

My view of the poor was challenged in a recent conversation with a pastor from our church who is from Togo and who had to flee his country almost ten years ago during civil unrest. He said to me that the mystery of God’s kingdom is that what is required of the wealthy is also required of the poor—to give everything. We then looked at the example of the widow who gave her only two mites. “He also saw a poor widow put in two very small copper coins. "I tell you the truth," he said, "this poor widow has put in more than all the others. All these people gave their gifts out of their wealth; but she out of her poverty put in all she had to live on." Luke 21:2-4

Does he require something different of you then of the widow with two mites? “He has showed you, O man, what is good. And what does the LORD require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God.” Micah 6:8 We are on the same playing field here and we need the poor just as they need the wealthy. How then do we engage the “web and the spiders” in light of the Gospel? I defer to a friend working in Kenya right now who recently wrote a reflection entitled Reconciliation…

In the bible it talks about how every tribe, tongue, and nation will be rejoicing together in heaven. And when I think of reconciliation, I don’t think it applies to just races and nations, but includes every relationship. Often times, this perfect union seems so far off and I question whether it is even possible. Our differences can be so divisive. It’s hard work to pursue reconciliation and often leads to frustration and further distance. But every once in awhile I get a little taste of this type of rejoicing and it is good. It’s good when people from different cultures, backgrounds, and races come together because of Christ. For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him, and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross. Colossians 1:19-20 He is the pathway to reconciliation. I’ve felt this in Kenya and it has given me hope…Reconciliation leads to a better way of doing life. It leads to the unity of people that benefits the community, church, family, and pretty much everyone involved.

Saturday, March 27, 2010

You Lack One Thing/Absolute Surrender: Chapter 3

"Tension is a better word than balance."

I was talking to a friend the other day and we agreed that the word balance is often used by American Christians to justify comfort. The better word is tension. Following Jesus requires an absolute surrender of everything. Stearns writes:

Consistent with His encounter with the rich young ruler, Jesus was requiring an absolute surrender. To be a disciple means forsaking everything to follow Jesus, unconditionally, putting our lives completely in His hands. When we say we want to be His disciple, yet attach a list of conditions, Jesus refuses to accept our terms. His terms involve unconditional surrender. (p. 39)

It is important to say here that when we first come to Jesus, we have not surrendered everything. When I became a Christian, I continued to hold onto many idols. However, following Jesus involves a lifetime of rejecting these idols. Jesus does not back down from this stance in our lives.

There are two kingdoms; the kingdom of this world and Jesus' kingdom. In Jesus kingdom, "things" are used as tools to bless others. In the kingdom of this world, "things" are used to oppress others (directly or indirectly).

Jesus does not want us to "balance" how we use the tools of this world (sometimes for ourselves and sometimes for others). We are always to put others first (Phil. 2:3-7).

Part of the tension in putting others first is that we will sometimes use tools for ourselves so that we may put others first. For example, part of the purpose of resting and relaxing is so that we can serve others well. Jesus goes to the mountainside to pray on many occasions so that he can serve others better (Mt. 8:1; 14:23; 15:29; 17:1--note that often the crowds follow him to the mountain!). I think that Paul used the travel time between cities (not short airplane flights but longer walking and boat journeys) to be refreshed and to spend time with his team (Timothy, Barnabas and others). In resting, there is a repentance of "I can do it all." In resting, we say "I am weak and in need of God's grace."

When we struggle with issues of how to use our resources (time, money, gifts), we should have a healthy tension that is suspended in an absolute surrender to Jesus (this is another way of saying we believe and follow Jesus).

Unhealthy tension is suspended in a belief that "I" can produce God's favor (I do therefore I am loved). "How much do I need to give until you will get off my back?" "I will give more money to cover for what I did wrong last week." "I will do my devotions so that I have a good day today."

Where do you feel tension in your life? Where do you see healthy tension in your life? Where do you have unhealthy tension? If you don't feel tension in your life, that should be a warning:

Jesus says: "If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, his wife and children, his brothers and sisters--yes even his own life--he cannot be my disciple. and anyone who does not carry his cross and follow me cannot be my disciple." (Luke 14:26-27)

All this talk of tension might seem oppressive and anxiety building. My experience is that tension produces strength and endurance just like the tension that is sustained in physical exercise (Paul uses the same analogy in I Cor. 9:27; 2 Tim. 4:7-8). Tension also highlights what is most important and shows the weakness in what is unimportant (just as "fire tests the quality of each man's work" I Cor. 3:13). Therefore, healthy tension in our life focuses our being on who is most important: Jesus.

Chapter 2 Questions

Questions for thought from Chapter 2...

Looking back, I believe now that He wanted me to see that I had come to depend more on myself than on Him, confusing my success with His approval. (p. 28)

Where do you depend more on yourself than on Jesus?

Have you put yourself in positions that require you to depend on Jesus?

Where have you confused your success with God's approval?

Bingo Card Evangelism; Chapter 1

Stearns refers to "Bingo Card" evangelism (p. 16-20).

Can God require anything of us? It's a question that seems like it has an obvious answer... Yes! But within American evangelicalism often the answer is, "Just believe!"

For many American evangelicals, "just believe," means an intellectual assent to a set of facts to get us into a nice afterlife. Stearns calls this "Bingo Card" evangelism (p. 17-18).

More and more, our view of the gospel has been narrowed to a simple transaction, marked by checking a box on a bingo card at some prayer breakfast, registering a decision for Christ, or coming forward during an altar call. (p. 17)

This is not a biblical definition of belief. A biblical definition of belief involves a willful decision resulting in action (Matthew 21:28-32; James 2:14-26). Paul unpacks this saying that both the decision and the action are a result of God's grace but he makes sure we know both the decision and action are inseparable--the result of God's covenant promise to us (Romans 6:15-23; Galatians 2). Stearns writes:

The kingdom of God which Christ said is "within you" (Luke 17:21 NKJV), was intended to change and challenge everything in our fallen world in the here and now. It was not meant to be a way to leave the world but rather the means to actually redeem it. Yes, it first requires that we repent of our own sinfulness and totally surrender our individual lives to follow Christ, but then we are also commanded to go into the world--to bear fruit by lifting up the poor and marginalized, challenging injustice wherever we find it, rejecting the worldly values found within every culture, and loving neighbors as ourselves. While our "joining" in the kingdom of God may begin with a decision... it requires so much more than that. (p. 17-18)

What does belief mean to you? What evidence is there of your belief in Jesus? What evidence does Jesus say is evidence of belief in him (Matthew 25:31-46)?

Saturday, March 13, 2010

We're starting our blog this year via Blogger and Facebook Notes. If you don't have a copy of The Hole in Our Gospel you can purchase it on Amazon here.

Look forward to learning from each other!

Grace,

Andrew

Saturday, March 6, 2010

The Hole in Our Gospel: Introduction

"What does God expect of us? That's what this book is about."

Richard Stearns answers his opening question in the introduction a few sentences later with the statement: "God asks us for everything."

This is a frightening statement for many people (including me!). Many churches and church leaders desire to qualify this statement. Jesus doesn't:

Anyone who loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; anyone who loves his son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me; and anyone who does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me. Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it. (Mt. 10:37-39)

No one can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and Money. (Mt. 6:24)
The kingdom of heaven is like treasure hidden in a field. When a man found it, he hid it again, and then in his joy went and sold all he had and bought that field. Again, the kingdom of heaven is like a merchant looking for fine pearls. When he found one of great value, he went away and sold everything he had and bought it. (Mt. 13:44-46)
Jesus replied: 'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments. (Mt. 22:37-40)

Then he called the crowd to him along with his disciples and said: "If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me and for the gospel will save it. What good is it for a man to gain the whole world, yet forfeit his soul? Or what can a man give in exchange for his soul? If anyone is ashamed of me and my words in this adulterous and sinful generation, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him when he comes in his Father's glory with the holy angels. (Mk.8:34-38)

What do you think about this statement: "God asks us for everything"?

Is it "enough" to say you are willing to give God everything but not really give him everything? What does it mean to give God everything? Reflect on the parable of the two sons in Matthew 21:28-32.

Friday, April 24, 2009

Chapter 4 "Which Jesus Takes Us to Deep Justice?

By Paul Patterson

There were things I loved about this chapter and things I didn’t. I didn’t love the bit about different “Jesuses.” Of course, the author is right that we tend to personalize and individualize Jesus by focusing on this or that aspect of his person—‘tender’ Jesus, ‘radical’ Jesus, ‘teacher’ Jesus, ‘quiet time’ Jesus, etc. What’s wrong with all of these—what they all have in common—is that they tend to see Jesus as an example to be followed. And the author seems to fall into the same trap by saying that what we really need is to put all of these aspects of his person together and to follow that. Now, Christ certainly provides an excellent example for us to follow; but that isn’t primarily why he came, because in our sin we couldn’t follow him if we wanted to! He came as a savior—to transform us into the kind of people who can follow him. What we really need is to submit ourselves each day to Christ the Savior, and everything else will follow.

I did, however, appreciate the author’s emphasis on Jesus as the personal embodiment of the kingdom of God. This has serious implications for how we Christians look at the world: it means that the kingdom is already present, while at the same time it’s not yet. The kingdom is already present because Jesus (the kingdom personified) is present. He inaugurated the kingdom by reconciling people to God and to one another (which must include the poor, the broken and the marginalized—see Luke 4), and he is still engaged in this business of reconciliation. At the same time, the kingdom is not yet present because Jesus has not yet appeared in glory. Injustice persists, people are still marginalized, systems are still broken. To quote one of my favorite bands (Radiohead), “everything is wrong.” And only God Incarnate can make it right again—which he will do, at his appearing.

Why is Jesus able to make everything right again? Precisely because he is God Incarnate. In assuming flesh, the Second Person of the Trinity transformed (at least in principle) all matter. One day he’s going to fashion for us new bodies and a new earth, and he’s going to use the stuff of these bodies and of this earth to do it (at least that’s my reading of 1 Corinthians 15). William Pannell (in the interview) is therefore right to emphasize Jesus’ humanity. I think he’s also right that many Evangelicals haven’t made much room for it in their theology. But our present and future hope lies precisely in the fact that God became human!

Some Discussion Questions:

1) Are you (or your youth group) ever guilty of focusing primarily on the ‘example’ aspect of Jesus?

2) What version of Jesus do you usually find yourself striving to follow? How is that working for you?

3) Does your youth group lean more in the direction of Christ’s divinity or humanity? Why do you think that is?

4) Does your youth group lean more heavily in the direction of the “already” or the “not yet” of God’s kingdom? Again, why do you think that is?

5) What misconceptions do you think your youth may have concerning the second coming, the resurrection, and the afterlife?

Monday, April 6, 2009

Discussion and Questions from Chapter 3

Sorry for the delay in getting our blog updated…we were blessed with about 500 volunteers in March! It was a wonderful blessing! Right now we’re playing a little catch up. So… Some thoughts and questions from Chapter 3…

This chapter starts out with a helpful comparison of Kara Powell’s own story of how she has taught about injustice.

First, she tried to guilt youth into addressing injustice. This worked…for a short time. Guilt-based ministry leads to short-term commitment to God’s agenda and long-term bitterness towards God and the church..

Second, she emphasized God’s grace to the neglect of God’s commands. This cheap grace ministry seemed to make folks comfortable but neglected any outreach to the community.

Where do you fall in this pendulum?

Kara Powell argues that youth leaders need to stop telling stories in the Bible and start telling the story of the Bible. Kara goes on to make a summary of her understanding of the story of the Bible.

In a paragraph, what would you say is the story of the Bible? Does your story speak to the issues of individual’s hearts? How does the story challenge individuals? Does your story speak to the social injustices of our society? How does your story challenge individuals to enter the mess of society?

Kara argues that “students’ motivation to right wrongs is directly related to their view of themselves as participants in God’s story” (p.48). What do you think of Kara’s argument? How have you seen this in your students?

Two “Justice Traps”

Kara argues that there are two traps that keep youth leaders from leading their students into deep justice.

First, youth leaders can perpetuate an “us” “them” mentality where the poor are viewed with pity and without dignity. Physically poor people are objects of our compassion rather than our brothers and sisters.

Second, youth leaders can ignore the issue of deep justice because it’s too big to tackle. What impact can I/we have anyway?

How do we escape these “justice traps”? Kara argues that we need to get students to participate (p.54)…and specifically to ask and facilitate the role of and leadership of poor students. As poor students participate and traps of us/them and the immensity of the problem are tackled head on. Poor students who lead will stand up to the us/them polarization in our groups and they will show that issues of poverty can be addressed…by the poor!

Who are some poor students in your youth group? How do you and your youth team facilitate their participation and leadership? For the middle-class and wealthy students in your youth group how are you inviting them to participate in the story of God's Kingdom?

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Questions for Discussion: Chapter 2

Questions for Discussion . . . Chapter 2

1) Is your church currently an Either/Or church? Which end of the Either/Or spectrum is it on?

2) What is good about falling on one end of the Either/Or spectrum? What is not so good about it?

3) Has your youth ministry already adopted a Both/And approach to ministry? If so, what sort of response did you get from parents, other pastors, your church or your community: Support? Raised eyebrows? Out and out resistance? If not, what sort of response might you expect?

4) What do you think it would take for your youth group to become a Both/And youth group? For your church to become a Both/And church?

5) What would Both/And ministry look like in your town/suburb/city? Where do you see poverty, oppression, suffering, etc? More importantly, where do your kids see it?

6) How close is the American church to fulfilling Perkins’ vision of the gospel? What will it take for us to get there?

Chapter 2 Reflection by Paul Patterson: Both/And or Either/Or?

Paul’s Thoughts on Chapter Two: Both/And or Either/Or?

There was a time—more than 100 years ago—when the church in America was a Both/And church. Most American Christians already knew what the author in this chapter is advocating: that the gospel of Jesus Christ is a message of both personal salvation (John 3:16) and corporate change (Luke 4:16-21), that God’s kingdom is concerned with both the spiritual (Matthew 5:3,6) and the physical (Luke 6:20-21), and that we are called both to evangelism (Matthew 28:18-20) and to deeds of justice (Matthew 25:31-46). For example, consider those Both/And Christians who led the fight for the abolition of slavery.

Then, about 100 years ago, two movements emerged that began to change all that. On the one hand there was the Fundamentalist Movement—church leaders who were committed to the “fundamentals” of the Christian faith. They published pamphlets emphasizing five such fundamentals (biblical inerrancy, the virgin birth, Christ’s miracles, his substitutionary atonement, and the bodily resurrection), and they stood in opposition to those seminaries and divinity schools where these truths were starting to be denied.

On the other hand there was the Social Gospel Movement—church leaders who were beginning to realize that people, when they come together in groups, often oppress the poor, discriminate against minorities, pollute the environment, and commit all sorts of evils that they would likely not commit as individuals. They gave this a name—social sin (as opposed to personal sin)—and they argued that the remedy for social sin is Jesus’ social message of freedom from oppression for the poor and marginalized.

Looking back, these two movements did not have to oppose one another. But they did. Big time. For fundamentalists, the social gospel came to be viewed as heresy (and, depending on who you ask, it still is). For social gospel advocates, “fundamentalism” became a dirty word (and again, depending on who you ask, it still is). More importantly, both sides denied what the other side affirmed. Social gospel advocates tended to deny the personal, spiritual and future aspects of God’s kingdom, while fundamentalists tended to deny the corporate, physical, here and now aspects of God’s kingdom. Neither seemed to notice that the kingdom could be (and is!) personal and corporate, spiritual and physical, already and not yet. Unfortunately, this false choice is one that we still live with today (with most evangelicals following the fundamentalists, and most “mainline” churches following the social gospel). In the words of our author, the church in American has become an Either/Or church.

However, another major change began to take place in the 1960s, when certain evangelical leaders (many of them African Americans strongly influenced by MLK) started calling the church back to Both/And ministry. Probably the most important among them was John Perkins, a sharecropper’s son who grew up in Mississippi amidst dire poverty. When he was 17 his older brother was murdered by local law enforcement, and he fled Mississippi vowing never to return. But after converting to Christianity in 1960 he did return to Mississippi with a passion to share the gospel. His outspoken nature and leadership in the Civil Rights Movement resulted in repeated harassment, beatings and imprisonment. Nevertheless, his ministry thrived, and today he is an international speaker and teacher on racial reconciliation, leadership and community development (see http://www.jmpf.org). I’ll conclude these thoughts with words from Perkins’ book Beyond Charity—words that form the basis for much of what we’re going to read in Deep Justice:

It is time for the church, yes, the whole church, to take a whole gospel on a whole mission to the whole world. It is time for us to exhibit by our very lives that we believe in the oneness of the Body of Christ. It is time for us to prove that the purpose of the gospel is to reconcile alienated people to God and to each other, across racial, cultural, social and economic barriers. It is time for the reconciling love of God that has touched each individual heart to spill over into love for our neighbor (Beyond Charity,
p. 18).

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Questions for Discussion...Chapter 1

“What’s Deep Justice and How Do I Know if I’m Doing It?” by Kara Powell


Does Jesus approve of the “shallow” responses to injustice (“Quick-And-Easy-Physical-Solution” and “Warm-And-Fuzzy-Relational-Solution”)? Where do you see examples of these responses in Scripture? In your church? In your life?

Where have you seen a “Deep-Systemic-Solution” taken in Scripture? In your church? In your community?

Are you okay with not fixing everything (did Jesus heal all the lepers in Israel in his lifetime?!)? Why or why not?

There are times where God calls us to enter more deeply into systemic issues of injustice. How has this looked in your life? Are there any systemic issues God is calling you to address with a team?

“Why are you interested in deeper justice within your youth ministry? What are some of the barriers you might face as you pursue deep justice?” p. 22

“How do the backgrounds of the students in your ministry influence the way you seek deep justice for our broken world?” p. 22

Monday, February 9, 2009

Andrew Stern's Interaction with Chapter 1

Andrew Stern’s Interaction with Chapter 1

I’ve really enjoyed many parts of this book so far…But I have to admit I thought the first two pages were guilt inducing and counter to the main arguments of the book. Kara Powell starts with the argument that a financial solution can solve a complex issue…Namely if the world gave up all its’ money for ice cream to the poor significant results would appear. Ironic for what she and Chap Clark are aiming to do, namely encouraging youth leaders not to put band aids on deep wounds.

That said, I REALLY ENJOYED the meat and examples of this chapter! Kara makes a poignant analogy (with fixing a road) that shows the difference between shallow and deep justice.

  • Physical Response—Quick and Easy—handing out sandwiches to homeless people we do not know; doing a clothing drive; building/working on a poor person’s home
  • Relational Response—Warm and Fuzzy—interacting with people in the mess; going regularly to a soup kitchen and taking time to get to know homeless people; working at a second-hand clothing store run by a non-profit and getting to know customers; coming back on a regular basis to a widow you have met whose home you initially worked on
  • Systemic Response—Deep Systemic Solution—looking at setting up a food co-op that provides jobs and an affordable and healthy food supply; creating a network/partnership of interested parties to renew a city block with businesses; discipling and mentoring local youth who start a business that does affordable, quality home repair for widows
While the authors’ stated goal is to get us to focus on systemic issues of injustice (rightly so!), the argument will no doubt be made that we need all three kinds of intervention. This is a good and true argument. God often calls us to apply a “quick and easy” physical or relational response that does not address systemic issues. Indeed, most of our days will be focused on these smaller, “easier” steps. This is the nature of life. As we hand out a cup of cold water, cloth the naked, provide shelter for the wanderer and visit those in prison, most of these acts are SIMPLE deeds of Jesus’ righteousness (more on that in chapter 5!).

Where do we see these simple (but I would argue hard) acts of righteousness in the Bible? Some Old Testament examples of Physical/Relational Responses:

  • David aiding a cripple member of an enemy’s household (Mephibosheth in 2 Samuel 9)
  • A widow, Ruth, gleaning food in a landowner's, Boaz's, fields (a for work program idea taken from Old Testament law—Ruth 2)

Some New Testament examples of Physical/Relational Responses:

  • Jesus’ physical miracles healing lepers, blind, and even the dead! These are immediate responses that produce profound change but do not address the underlying issues of disease or sickness that would prevent numerous others from the same illnesses. Jesus does not go to Rome and argue for new laws or social services for those suffering these diseases.
  • The Good Samaritan (Luke 10). This is both a physical and relational response but does not deal with the systemic issues of crime on the road (see Powell’s quote from Martin Luther King, Jr. on p. 13). The Samaritan goes further than most of us (I) often do—addressing not only emergency care but also gives the innkeeper money to care for him while he must leave.

But the Bible also has plenty of examples of the Deep Justice solutions that Powell and Clark argue for…

  • The law of gleaning (Leviticus 19:9-10. This was civil law in the Old Testament and a systemic approach at helping the poor. It necessitated work on two sides…Landowners making sure that stalks/food was left in the field and the poor harvesting it.
  • The law of tithing to give to the widow, the fatherless and the immigrants/aliens (Deuteronomy 14:28-29). This was a systemic “tax” of sorts to make sure these individuals were cared for on an ongoing basis.
  • The early church’s debate, teaching and practice of caring for widows (instituting a systemic approach that used local leadership and the structure of the church to care for widows in a multi-ethnic context—Acts 6:1-7; 1 Timothy 5:3-16; James 1:27).
  • The ultimate systemic solution for our issues is dealt with by Jesus on the cross! This is a systemic solution without equal.

Thursday, February 5, 2009

Amazon Link for Deep Justice in a Broken World





For folks looking for a copy of the book...


Here is the link to Amazon:


http://www.amazon.com/Deep-Justice-Broken-World-Specialties/dp/0310273773/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1233870125&sr=8-1


Two teasers...


First... See the trailer for a full-length film by high school students looking deeply into issues of racism... The authors of Deep Justice argue this is an example of students not merely "driving by" an issue of injustice in their high school but subversivly addressing it in the light of the Gospel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4Pi41dmowU


Second... The suburbs in America have 1.2 million more poor people than the suburbs (Deep Justice in a Broken World, 20). How is the suburban church addressing poverty?


Grace,


Andrew

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Discussion of Deep Justice in a Broken World

Hello all!



This is Andrew Stern and Paul Patterson's first attempt at blogging...Have patience!



The framework...We're inviting folks to read through Kara Powell and Chap Clark's book Deep Justice in a Broken World. Paul and I will be blogging our comments and throwing out some questions to whoever's out there.



The time layout...



February 15...Chapters 1 & 2

March 1...Chapters 3 & 4

March 15...Chapters 5 & 6

April 1...Chapters 7 & 8

April 15...Chapters 9 & 10

May 1...Chapters 11 & 12



The format if primarily for leaders who are coming to join New City Fellowship and Restore St. Louis' Summer Urban Teams (http://restorestlouis.org/workteams/index.asp) for 2009 but we're open to other folks who want to join the discussion.



God's grace to you,



Andrew Stern